APHC010422432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 19828/2018 Between: 1. NTPC BHEL POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD., MANNAVARAM, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTT, AP REP BY ITS, MANAGING DIRECTOR/ CEO, SHRI J GOVINDASWAMY. 2. A.B. RAVICHANDRAN,, DIRECTOR (OPERATIONS) NTPC BHEL POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD. MANNAVARAM, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP.BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT SHASTRI BHAWAN, C-WING, DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, NEW DELHI - 110 011. 2. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 5TH FLOOR, LOK NAYAK, BHAWAN, KHAN MARKET, NEW DELHI-110003, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 3. NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES, JURISDICTION-TELENGANA, 204, MAITRIVIHAR, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD-500038, REP.BY ITS RESEARCH OFFICER. 4. T VASUDEVA, S/O T . VEERANNA, SR. DGM, NTPC BHEL POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD. MANNAVARAM, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTT, AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CH SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ADHI VENKATESWARA RAO 2. PASALA PONNA RAO (SC FOR CENT GOVT.) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.19828 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate Writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the orders of the 3rd Respondent, dated 18- 05-2018 in .F.No 1/90/17/AP-Ser., asking upon the Petitioners to disburse the Salary to the 4th Respondent for the period he has not worked by entertaining the complaint of the 4th Respondent for the redressal of his service conditions arising out of a transfer order and for regularization of the period of unauthorized absence and for payment of salary for the period he has not worked as being without jurisdiction and contrary to the Rules of NCSC and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to reject the complaints filed by 4th Respondent filed on 22.07.2017 and on 08.02.2018 and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of case and pass…” 2. No representation on either side, though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. Earlier also, there was no representation on either side. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 13.08.2025 Pmk 4 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:19828 OF 2018 Date: 13.08.2025 Pmk