Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29466 (AP)

R V RAMANA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21478/2025 · 2025-08-12

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010422292025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 21478/2025 Between: 1. R V RAMANA RAO, S/O R.VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, OCC RETD GOVT SERVANT H.NO.4-12-534, STREET NO. 6, VANASTHALIPURAM, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPT, STATE SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. DY SUPT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. CIRCLE INSPECTOR AND SHO, C/O NARASARAO I TOWN POLICE STATION, PALNADU DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an order or a writ or a direction, more specifically a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus declaring the action of Respondent officials in detaining the petitioners detenue son R.Vijay Venkateswar Rao 2 without following established procedures mandated by law as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of his fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 21 and 22 the Constitution of India and consequently direct Respondent officials to produce his person immediately and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SRINATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue has been released, subsequent to the filing of the present Writ Petition. 2. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is closed leaving it open to the petitioner or the detenue to approach this Court in the event of any future difficulty. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. _________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J. Date: 13.08.2025 BSM 4 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.21478 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Date: 13.08.2025 BSM