Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
::1::
APHC010421832016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10047/2016
Between: Shaik Sayyad Ameer, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND A P State Wakf Board and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A S C BOSE
2. S ARIFULLAH
::2::
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO:10047 of 2016
This Court made the following
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
02.01.2025 krk
::3::
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.10047 of 2016 02nd January, 2025
krk
183