Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:6789
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2659 of 2020 • Manglin Bai W/o Late Keju Ram, Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Chatera, Tahsil Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Secretary, State Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. Collector, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
5. Sub Divisional Officer, Mandhar Branch, Sub Division Arang, Water Resources Department, Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
6. Tahsildar, Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
7. Manager, Cooperative Societies, Village Bhilai (For The Registration Of Paddy), Tahsil Arang, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 to 6 : Mr. Dashrath Parajapati, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 06/02/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI
2
“10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order, direction directing the respondent No. 3 (Collector) for issuance of order for registration of petitioner’s land for purchasing of paddy and also direct the respondent No. 7 to register the land of petitioner for purchasing of paddy. 10.2 Any appropriate writ, direction or order may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case.”
2. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agrawal, appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before the Collector.
3. No objection from other side.
4. Permission granted.
5. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioner makes representation before the concerned authority, it is expected that the authority concerned will decide the same strictly in accordance with law. Sd/-
(Rakesh Mohan Pandey)
Judge vatti