IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CARBC No. 6 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.5.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ M/s SVS Enterprises and Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus M/s Bennet Pharmaceuticals Ltd. …....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioners: Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent: Ms. Madhurika Sekhon, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the applicants states that despite repeated communications, applicants are not coming forward to impart instructions and as such, he is unable to render proper assistance to this Court. 2. Having taken note of aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the applicants, in whose favour, power of attorney has been executed by the applicants, this Court has reason to presume and believe that applicants are not interested in prosecuting the case further and as such, same is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. May 11, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge