Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29457 (KAR)

SMT. DEVERAMA @ PARVATHAMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/17920/2025 · 2025-06-24

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22016 WP No. 17920 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.17920 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. DEVERAMA @ PARVATHAMA W/O. SRI. S.K SUBBEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT SOLLEPURA POST, KIKKERI HOBLI, KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571426. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUPRITH K.H., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, MS BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA-571401. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT. MANDYA-571434. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KRISHNARAJAPETE TALUK, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22016 WP No. 17920 of 2025 MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571426. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 10.04.2001, 18.01.2024 AND 15.04.2025 VIDE ANNEXURES-M, N AND Q, Q1 AND Q2. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondents. 2. The petitioner in this writ petition is seeking for a direction to the respondent-authority to consider the representations of the petitioner produced at Annexures-'M, N and Q, Q1, Q2'. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22016 WP No. 17920 of 2025 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate, it is seen that the petitioner has made application through online seeking phody in respect of the subject land as per Annexure-P. Further the pahani is mismatching in so far as RTC are concerned. 4. In that view of the matter, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representation Annexure-Q2 and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 49