Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29457 (AP)

Arasavilli Veera Venkata Lakshmi v. The Union of India

WP/22387/2025 · 2025-09-22

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010422532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22387/2025 Between: 1. ARASAVILLI VEERA VENKATA LAKSHMI, , W/O ARASAVILLI DURGA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO.32/26-53, ELURU ROAD, MACHAVARAM, NEAR ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NTR DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE ZONAL MANAGER, INDIAN BANK, ZONAL OFFICE, GANDHINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, INDIAN BANK, MOGALRAJAPURAM BRANCH, NEAR BENZ CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 to 4 are not considering my representation Dated 05-08-2025 for granting 12 months of time to clear the loans outstanding amount in respect of Home Loan Account Nos.7521982494 and 7534764481 in the name of the Petitioner by selling or mortgaging other assets of the Petitioner and not granting 2 time in my favor, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of principals of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the Respondent No.4 to considering my representation Dated 05-08-2025 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PANGI RAJU BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C V R RUDRA PRASAD (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. SATYANARAYANA DHARA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 23rd September, 2025 cbn 4 626 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.22387 of 2025 23rd September, 2025 cbn