Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29451 (HP)

HIMFED v. SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA

CMP.M/1864/2024 · 2025-11-04

Ranjan Sharma

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CMP(M) No.1864 of 2024 in Review Petition No… of 2024 in Execution Petition 174 of 2020 Decided on: 04.11.2025 ____________________________________________________________ The H.P.State Co-operative Marketing and Consumer Federation Limited …Petitioner Versus Satya Prakash Sharma …Respondent Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner: Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate alongwith Mr. Raj Kumar Thakur, Law Officer. For the respondent: Notice not issued. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, on instructions of Mr. Raj Kumar Thakur, Law Officer, who is present in Court, on instructions received from Review Petitioner states that the petitioner does not intend to continue with the instant petition and therefore, they may be permitted to 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? - 2 - withdraw the same, [Statement taken on Record]. 2. Since this Court had not issued any notice to the Respondent, as yet, therefore, based on the aforesaid statement, the instant petition is disposed of, as infructuous, in the aforesaid terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 4th November, 2025 (tm)