Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CMP(M) No.1864 of 2024 in Review Petition No… of 2024 in Execution Petition 174 of 2020
Decided on: 04.11.2025 ____________________________________________________________
The H.P.State Co-operative Marketing and Consumer Federation Limited
…Petitioner Versus
Satya Prakash Sharma
…Respondent
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the petitioner: Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate alongwith Mr. Raj Kumar Thakur, Law Officer.
For the respondent: Notice not issued.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Mr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Advocate, on instructions of Mr. Raj Kumar Thakur, Law Officer, who is present in Court, on instructions received from Review Petitioner states that the petitioner does not intend to continue with the instant petition and therefore, they may be permitted to
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
- 2 - withdraw the same, [Statement taken on Record].
2. Since this Court had not issued any notice to the Respondent, as yet, therefore, based on the aforesaid statement, the instant petition is disposed of, as infructuous, in the aforesaid terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge 4th November, 2025 (tm)