IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. P. No. 572/2025 Decided on: 31.12.2025 Dr. Satya Prakash Katyal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. Respondents .……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Assistant Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Pursuant to the detailed orders passed in this execution petition from time to time, learned counsel for respondent No.2 has placed on record fresh office instructions dated 29.12.2025 from the Secretary H.P. Private Educational Institutions Regulatory Commission. The instructions are self-speaking. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid instructions have redressed the surviving grievance of the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? petitioner and the judgment in question now stands duly complied with. 3. In view of above submissions, this execution petition is disposed of as satisfied. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 31st December, 2025 (rohit)