SRI DAYYAM VENKATRAMANA REDDY v. GUTTAPALLE SAI PRASAD
CC/3781/2024 · 2025-03-11
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29450 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29450 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010422332024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3781/2024 Between:
1. SRI DAYYAM VENKATRAMANA REDDY, S/O YERIKALA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4/383-A, ALAVALAPADU VILLAGE VEMPALLE MANDALA, KADAPA DISTRICT PIN 516 350
2. SRI SIRIGIREDDY SAMBA SIVA REDDY, S/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, D.NO.24, ALAVALAPADU VILLAGE VEMPALLE MANDALA, KADAPA DISTRICT PIN 516 350
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. GUTTAPALLE SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION, THE GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE AMARVATHY MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. SMT M JANAKI, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE. THE GOVT, OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARVATHY MANDAL,
GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. SMT K KOUSER, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR (LA) GALIREU NAGARI SRUJALA SRAVANTHI/GNSS COLLECITORATE KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT
4. SRI CHANDRA MOHAN, THE SPECAIL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LA, GNSS UNIT LI COLLECITORATE KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT
5. SRI MALLIKARJUNA REDDY, THE CHIEF ENGINEER PROJECTS WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT KADAPA
6. SRI VENKATARAMAIAH, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURECES DEPARTMENT IRRIGATION DIVISION, KADAPA
...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. SUSHMA YAGANTI
3. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER: Sri Ms. Lakshmi Nandini, learned Counsel representing Sri S.S. Bhatt, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioners, on instructions, submits that the Orders of this Court have been complied with, inasmuch as the Petitioners have received the amounts. Therefore, no further consideration is required by this Court.
2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt: 11.03.2025 DSV