[2025:RJ-JP:37753] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11339/2025 Ajaydan @ Ajju S/o Kailash Dan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 158 Jay Nagar, Murlipura, District Jaipur. (Presently Confined In District Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Lokendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 192/2023 registered at Police Station Sodala, District Jaipur City (South), for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the vehicle for which loan was taken by the petitioner has already been taken in possession by the bank and auction of the said vehicle and recovery of amount thereof has already been effected. It is also contended that the petitioner is suffering from liver cirrhosis, the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025 and the trial of [2025:RJ-JP:37753] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11339/2025] the case may take considerable time and charge-sheet has already been submitted, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner by forging the documents obtained loan from the bank. It is also contended that the petitioner was also found to be involved in offence under Section 309 of BNS, therefore, considering the gravity of the offence, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2025, charge-sheet has already been submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time and, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ajaydan @ Ajju S/o Kailash Dan, in connection with FIR No. 192/2023 registered at Police Station Jaipur City (South), District Sodala, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:37753] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11339/2025] 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/188