- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22841 WP No. 18812 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 18812 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. JAYARAMAIAH, S/O LATE SONNAPPA AND LATE BAYYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NO.204/5, SADAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 110. 2. SRI. NARAYANASWAMY B. S., S/O LATE SONNAPPA AND LATE BAYYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.263, VAJARAJAHALLI, BAIYANAPALYA, THALAGHATTAPURA POST, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU – 560 109. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI VASANTH RAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GOWRAMMA, W/O SRI KRISHNAPPA, D/O LATE SONNAPPA AND LATE BAYYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/AT PARAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, VAGATA AGRAHARA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 114. 2. SMT. ANNAMMA, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22841 WP No. 18812 of 2025 W/O SRI. VENKATAGIRIYAPPA, D/O LATE SONNAPPA AND LATE BAYYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NO.39, NIRAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 139. 3. SMT. RATHNAMMA, W/O SRI MUNINARAYANA, D/O LATE SONNAPPA AND LATE BAYYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.112, NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL, BHOGANAHALLI VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU – 563 103. 4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER DEPARTMENT – 3, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, KRIDE, NO.14/3, ARVIND BHAVAN, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU – 09. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED ON I.A.NO.III FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC IN O.S.NO. 650/2024 DTD. 09.06.2025 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE (CCH-6). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22841 WP No. 18812 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "The undersigned advocate for the Petitioners prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the Petitioners to withdraw the above petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy u/o 43 Rule 1R as against the impugned order, hence this memo in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. The time spent in prosecuting the subject petition which is to be preferred before this Court as an appeal, shall not be taken note of, for the purpose of computation of delay. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CBC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22 CT:SS