Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29446 (JHR)

PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/1049/2024 · 2025-02-07

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 1049 of 2024 1. Pramod Kumar Singh, aged about 53 years, son of Sri Indradeo Singh, resident of village-Rajamandih, Post Office-Munkeri, Police Station- Chattarpur, District-Palamau, Jharkhand 2. Sumesh Prasad, aged about 50 years, son of late Arjun Sahu, resident of village-Dumri, Post Office-Namudag, Police Station-Naodiha Bazar, Taridih, Namudag, Chattarpur, District-Palamau, Jharkhand ... … Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, the Principal Secretary, School Education, Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 3. Mr. Shashi Ranjan, the Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. Mr. Sandeep Kumar, the District Superintendent of Education-cum- District Programme Officer, Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan, Palamau, PO & PS- Daltonganj, District-Palamau, Jharkhand 5. Mr. Mahindra Prajapati, the Block Education Officer, Chhatarpur East, Palamau, PO & PS-Chhatarpur, District-Palamau, Jharkhand … … Opposite Partis CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioners : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suresh Kumar, SC (L&C)-II For the O.P Nos.4 & 5 : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate Mr. Rajvardhan, Advocate -------- Order No. 03/Dated: 7th February 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. He submits that the petitioners have been reinstated pursuant to the order passed by this Court. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case (Civil) stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit