Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2944 (BOM)

Siraj Fakir Mohammad Qureshi v. Anti Narcotic Cell, Ghatkopar Unit

REVN/379/2025 · 2026-01-28

Shri Shivkumar Dige

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

123-REVN-379-2025 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 379 OF 2025 Siraj Fakir Mohammad Qureshi … Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent _________________________________________________________________ Ms. Puja Yadav i/b. Mr. Shreerat Kamath, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for the Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the Revision Applicant submits that by this application, applicant has challenged the order rejecting the order of discharge by order under the provisions of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("NDPS Act"). But during the pendency of this application, charges have been framed against the applicant and applicant has preferred separate application challenging the framing of charge. The said application is under scrutiny. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the Revision Applicant, this Revision Application has become infructuous. Dismissed SONALI SATISH KILAJE Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date: 2026.01.31 17:04:50 +0700 123-REVN-379-2025 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje and disposed of. I make it clear, this application has not decided on merit. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)