Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29427 (CHH)

SHARDA DHRUW v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6128/2025 · 2025-06-24

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:27850 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6128 of 2025 1 - Sharda Dhruw D/o Mr. Bodhiram Dhruw Aged About 35 Years Post Assistant Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt. Primary School Bangabari, Block Narharpur Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Instruction, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur 3 - The Collector And President District Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 6 - Joint Director Education, Division Baster Jagdalpur Distt. Baster Chhattisgarh ... Respondents 2025:CGHC:27867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6154 of 2025 1 - Sheikh Imran Ulla S/o Mr. Sheikh Irfan Ulla Aged About 48 Years Post Assistant Teacher Local Body, Posted At Govt. Girls Primary School Sarona, Block Narharpur, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Instruction, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur 3 - The Collector And President District Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh 6 - Joint Director Education Division Baster Jagdalpur Distt. Baster Chhattisgarh ... Respondents 2025:CGHC:27906 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6220 of 2025 1 - Dharmendra Kumar Mandavi S/o Mr. Vaidyaraj Mandavi Aged About 35 Years Post Assistant Teacher (Local Body) Posted At Govt. Primary School Guhanpara Block Narharpur District - Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mantralaya Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Mantralaya Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector And President District Rationalization Committee District - Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer District - Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary District Level Rationalization Committee District - Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.) 6 - Joint Director Education Division Baster Jagdalpur District - Baster (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate. 3 For State/Respondents : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Mr. Santosh Bharat and Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyers. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 25-06-2025 1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents are against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners and if the petitioners are not granted interim relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned orders are liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioners have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. They would further submit that if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take decision on their representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today, and appear before the said Committee on 01st July, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation(s) of the petitioners within seven days from the date of receipt of representation(s) in accordance with law in objective manner. Till decision on the representation is communicated to the 4 respective petitioners, the impugned transfer orders issued under Teacher Rationalization Instructions, so far as the petitioners are concerned, be kept in abeyance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil