1 2025:CGHC:29788 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6874 of 2025 1 - Rajkishor Patel S/o Tulsiram Patel Aged About 42 Years Assistant Teacher (L.B.) R/o House No. 17/3, Ward No. 04, Patel Mohalla, Gram - Nandeli, Tahsil - Pussore, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh - 496440. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 3 - Director Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector Collectorate, Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, on behalf of Mr. Akhand Pratap, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 02/07/2025 ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.07.03 10:41:55 +0530 2 1. By way of this writ petitions, the petitioner is challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioner has been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not joined at his transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner, and if the petitioner is not granted relief, he will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the petitioner still want to pursue his representation before the concerned authorities to redress his grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioner has been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioner is having any grievance, he may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on his representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period 3 of 05 days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of 05 days from the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law, in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stands disposed of. Sd/-Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok