- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5886 WP No. 102062 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102062 OF 2018 (L-WC) BETWEEN: 1. ABDULMAJID S/O MAKTUMSAB SAYYAD, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLONY, NEAR MULGUND NAKA, GADAG-582 103. 2. SMT. MAMATAZ BEGAUM W/O SHAMESHAMMOD SAYYED, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: ZAKIR HUSSAIN COLONY, NEAR MULGUND NAKA, GADAG-582 103. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.G.KADADAKATTI., ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT. JARINABEGUM W/O BASHASAB DAMBAL, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: RAJIV GANDHINAGAR, GADAG-582 101. 2. AFZAL S/O BASHASAB DAMBAL, AGE: MINOR, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: RAJIV GANDHINAGAR, GADAG, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER JARINABEGAUM W/O BASHASAB DAMBAL, RAJIV GANDHINAGAR, GADAG-582 101. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5886 WP No. 102062 of 2018 3. FAIZAHMAD S/O BASHASAB DAMBAL, AGE: MINOR, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: RAJIV GANDHINAGAR, GADAG, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER JARINABEGAUM W/O BASHASAB DAMBAL, RAJIV GANDHINAGAR, GADAG-582 101. 4. AFRINABANU S/O BASHASAB DAMBAL, AGE: MINOR, OCC: STUDENT, R/O: RAJIV GANDHINAGAR, GADAG, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER JARINABEGAUM W/O BASHASAB DAMBAL, RAJIV GANDHINAGAR, GADAG-582 101. 5. SRI. ABDUL RAHEEM S/O ABDUL MULLA, CONTRACTOR AND ENGINEER, R/O: BEHIND P AND T QUARTERS, NEAR KANNADA PRIMARY SCHOOL, GADAG BETAGERI, GADAG-582 101. … RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R5-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Though the case is called twice, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5886 WP No. 102062 of 2018 The petition is filed in 2018. Now we are in the month of April, 2025. It is pending from almost seven years. As already noted above, when the case is called twice, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 59