DAYAL SINGH S/O SHRI BHAIRU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/11340/2025 · 2025-09-16
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29409 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29409 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37754] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11340/2025
1. Dayal Singh S/o Shri Bhairu Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Jhajheu, Police Station Seruna, District Bikaner. (At Present In Jail, Sikar).
2. Sandeep Singh S/o Shri Harpal Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Dhani Usariya, Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present In Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satish Khandal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 16/09/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 179/2025 registered at Police Station Khatu Shyamji, District Sikar for the offences under Section 19/54 of Excise Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioners are in custody since 16.08.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
[2025:RJ-JP:37754] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11340/2025]
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since 16.08.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Dayal Singh S/o Shri Bhairu Singh 2. Sandeep Singh S/o Shri Harpal Singh, in connection with FIR No. 179/2025 registered at Police Station Khatu Shyamji, District Sikar, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The accused-petitioner- Sandeep Singh is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/189