Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29406 (HP)

RAJENDER KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/64/2025 · 2025-01-02

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.64 of 2025 Decided on: 2nd January, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Rajender Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Daleep Singh Kaith, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Leena Guleria, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is presently serving as Veterinary Pharmacists at Veterinary Dispensary Duni, District Kinnaur, H.P. The case set up by him is that on completion of three summers and two winters, that is prescribed in the transfer policy of the State for serving in hard and tribal areas, he had submitted representation to the respondents, seeking his 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - transfer to a soft area of his choice vide Annexure P-2, dated 23.12.2024. His grievance is that his representation has not been considered in accordance with law. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner be permitted to file a fresh representation in accordance with the applicable transfer policy to respondent No.2/Competent Authority, whereafter respondent No.2/Competent Authority be directed to consider the same within a time bound schedule. 4. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation to respondent No.2/Competent Authority within two weeks, who shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy within further four weeks. The decision so taken be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 2, 2025 R.Atal