ABDUL RAHEMAN ABDUL RAHIM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
CP/363/2016 · 2025-09-22
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29399 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29399 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
53 CONT. PETITION NO. 363 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 363 OF 2016 IN WP/6881/2013 Abdul Raheman Abdul Rahim VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others … None for the Petitioner Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent No. 1 Mr. S. S. Bora, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 … CORAM :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, JJ. DATE :
SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 O R D E R :
1. Learned advocate for Respondent/Corporation, on telephonic instructions, submits that petitioner is no more. Till the petitioner was alive, he was receiving the pension and now his wife is receiving family pension.
2. In that view of the matter, the order is complied with. Hence, Contempt Petition is disposed of.
(SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) komal kamble
Page|1 2025:BHC-AUG:26520-DB