Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29398 (CHH)

Mahesh Kumar Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

WPS/5864/2019 · 2025-07-01

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:29693 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5864 of 2019 1 - Mahesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Surendra Kumar Sharma Aged About 59 Years Working As Sub Engineer, O/o Mahanadi Head Water Management, Sub Division No. 01, Rudri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, R/o Shri Krishna Nagar, Rudri, District Dhamtari. 2 - Ravishankar Pandey S/o Late Ramnarayan Pandey Aged About 56 Years Working As Sub Engineer, O/o TDPP, Water Resources Division, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh, R/o MIG D/12, C.G. Housing Board Colony, Lal Bag, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Arvind Sharma S/o Shri Bacharam Sharma Aged About 55 Years Working As Sub Engineer, O/o Hasdeo Baraj, Water Management, Rampur, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh R/o NC 160, CSEB Colony, Korba East, District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Engineer - In - Chief, Water Resources Department, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Shri Ravindra Kumar Sharma Assistant Engineer, Water Management, Sub Division No 3, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title, as taken from CIS) For Petitioners : None For State/Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Amandeep Singh, Panel Lawyer. RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2025.07.03 10:27:23 +0530 2 (Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 02/07/2025 1. On previous date of hearing, none appeared for the petitioners. Even today, despite repeated calls, neither the petitioners appeared nor represented by any counsel. In this circumstance, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Rukhsar