HDFC BANK LTD v. M/S NARAYANA ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD
WP/19311/2021 · 2025-07-02
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29396 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29396 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23755 WP No. 19311 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 19311 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
HDFC BANK LTD DEPARTMENT FOR SPECIAL OPERATIONS NO.7 AND 7/1 2ND FLOOR ESSEL CHAMBERS LALBAGH ROAD, RICHMOND CIRCLE BANGALORE-560027 REP BY ITS SENIOR MANAGER AND BOARD RESOLUTION HOLDER MR ANAND RAJ R
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHABALESHWAR CHITRIGEMATH., ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1.
M/S NARAYANA ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD REP BY OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR NO.69 1ST FLOOR 4TH MAIN 4TH BLOCK 3RD STAGE, S G NAGAR BASAVESHWARA NAGAR BANGALORE-560079.
2.
MR U NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O LATE UGRAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.13, 8TH CROSS PRASHANTH NAGAR MAGADI ROAD BANGALORE-560079.
3.
MR U NARAYANA MURTHY S/O LATE UGRAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.69 4TH CROSS
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23755 WP No. 19311 of 2021
SG NAGAR, 3RD STAGE BASAVESHWARA NAGAR BANGALORE-560079.
4.
THE DEPUTY COMMSSIONER OF COMMERICAL TAXES (AUDIT)-2.2 DVO-2 6TH FLOOR, ROOM NO.605 VTK-2 KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560047.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DTD.9.11.2016 PASSED BY THE SPECIAL JMFC (SALE TAX) BANGALORE PASSED IN CRL MISC NO.4/2013 IN ATTACHING THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER ANNEXURE-L AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1. Despite the order dated 29.04.2025, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner nor office objections have been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LN, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16