Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1024 WP No. 3927 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3927 OF 2021 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI MOHAMMED WAZIR BAIG S/O ANWAR BAIG, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.80/1, 6TH CROSS, HANIFIA MASJID, KUSHALNAGAR, BENGALURU-560 045.
2.
SYED MERAJ AHMED S/O SYED SIRAJUDDIN, NO.40/1, GOVIND CHETTY COLONY, TASKER TOWN, BANGALORE-560 051. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.V.VEDACHALA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE CHIEF SECRETARY, VIKASA SOUDHA, KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINORITY WELFARE, 214, II FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
3.
SMT.KHAZI NAFIZA OF MAJOR AGE, 5, JAL BHAVAN, 1, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1024 WP No. 3927 of 2021
BENGALURU.
KARNATAKA-560 029. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1;
R2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioners it was ordered to be listed on 10.01.2025.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1024 WP No. 3927 of 2021
The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioners. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27