Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29384 (KAR)

H M UMESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/932/2017 · 2025-06-06

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19225 CRL.RP No. 932 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 932 OF 2017 BETWEEN: H M UMESH S/O. H M MURUGESHAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS OCC: ADVOCATE, RESIDING AT No.24 SRI SAI ASHIRWADH JAYARAM LAYOUT BANNERAGHATTA BANGALORE – 560 083. …PETITIONER (BY SRI GAUTAM BHARADWAJ, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMURTHY NAGAR POLICE STATION BANGALORE – 560 016. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI M DIVAKAR MADDUR, HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 AND 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.01.2017 PASSED IN C.C.No.9848/2015 ON THE FILE OF IV ACMM, BANGALORE AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19225 CRL.RP No. 932 of 2017 ORAL ORDER The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 23.01.2017 passed in C.C.No.9848/2015 passed by the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Benagaluru, whereunder the application filed by the petitioner –accused No.7 under Section 239 of Cr.P.C seeking discharge has been rejected. 2. As the impugned order is passed by the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Benagaluru, petition lies to the Sessions Court. 3. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the Sessions Court. 4. Interim order granted by this Court will continue for a period of 30 days from this day. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69