Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3282 of 2023 Revisionist :- Juvenile X Minor Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Manoj Kumar Tripathi,Vinod Kumar Tirpathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press the prayer for bail in the present revision despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State is present. 3. The present revision under Section 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 has been filed by the revisionist-Juvenile X Minor with the prayers to admit and allow the present revision, set aside the judgment and order dated 06.04.2023 passed by Additional Session Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Bijnor in Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2023, and order dated 14.03.2023 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Bijnor arising out of Case Crime No. 07 of 2023, under Section 376AB IPC and Section 5M/6 POCSO Act, P.S. Dhampur, District Bijnor and with a further prayer to release the revisionist on bail in the aforesaid case, during the pendency of the present revision. 4. Even previously on 15.10.2024 there was no representation from the side of the revisionist but the matter was adjourned by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the following order was passed: "1. Case called out in the revised call. 2. None appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this criminal revision, whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present. 3.Perusal of order sheet shows that earlier matter was adjourned on 21.08.2023, 30.10.2023, 08.11.2023 and 19.12.2023 on the request of learned counsel for the revisionist. It appears that learned counsel for the revisionist is not inclined to argue the matter. 4. List this case in the 2nd Week of January, 2025." 5. Today since again even in the revised list there is no representation on behalf of the revisionist despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing even it is for the second time to argue the matter, the prayer for bail in the present revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. The revision is consigned to record. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad