IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 223 PARAMJIT SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.19 dated 06.02.2025, under Section Sadar Hoshiarpur 2. anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: from the liquor vend of the complainant along with two cartons false case upon the petitioner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: May 22 PARAMJIT SINGH @ PALLA Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab with Inspector Parmodh Kumar. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed under Section for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.19 dated .2025, under Section 309(2) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station Sadar Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P On 27.02.2025, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of the said order reads as under: - “Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that it was on account of previous enmity between rival businessmen i.e. the employer of the petitioner on one side and the complainant on the other side, that the instant FIR came to be registered wherein false allegations have been levelled that some unidentified persons snatched Rs.24,000/ from the liquor vend of the complainant along with two cartons of liquor and a mobile handset of the complainant. Further, it is a matter of record that an FIR was registered at the instance of the petitioner against the employees of the complainant prior in time on 26.08.2024, which was one of the reasons to plant a false case upon the petitioner.” IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-10877-2025 Date of decision: May 22, 2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab . The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.19 dated ) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station (Annexure P-1). On 27.02.2025, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that it on account of previous enmity between rival businessmen i.e. the employer of the petitioner on one side and the complainant on the other side, that the instant FIR came to be registered wherein false allegations have been levelled that rsons snatched Rs.24,000/- at gunpoint from the liquor vend of the complainant along with two cartons of liquor and a mobile handset of the complainant. Further, it is a matter of record that an FIR was registered at the instance of the employees of the complainant prior in time on 26.08.2024, which was one of the reasons to plant a ...Petitioner ...Respondent 482 of BNSS, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.19 dated ) of BNS, 2023, registered at Police Station On 27.02.2025, the petitioner had been granted interim anticipatory bail with direction to join investigation and the relevant part of Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that it on account of previous enmity between rival businessmen i.e. the employer of the petitioner on one side and the complainant on the other side, that the instant FIR came to be registered wherein false allegations have been levelled that at gunpoint from the liquor vend of the complainant along with two cartons of liquor and a mobile handset of the complainant. Further, it is a matter of record that an FIR was registered at the instance of the employees of the complainant prior in time on 26.08.2024, which was one of the reasons to plant a Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.22 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-10877 3. compliance of order dated 27.02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. 4. factum of the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial interrogation. 5. dated 27.02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 10877-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in compliance of order dated 27.02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the f the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the petition is allowed, and interim order dated 27.02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./482(2) BNSS. May 22, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in compliance of order dated 27.02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the f the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial ve, the petition is allowed, and interim order dated 27.02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated that in compliance of order dated 27.02.2025, the petitioner has joined investigation Learned State counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the f the petitioner having joined investigation and cooperated with the investigating agency. He, on further instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required for further investigation, much less for his custodial ve, the petition is allowed, and interim order dated 27.02.2025, is made absolute subject to the conditions laid down in Jaspreet Kaur 2025.05.22 18:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh