IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 227 CRWP-10789-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.03.2026 VINEET KUMAR BHATI ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Gautam Kaile, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent No.4. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that representation, Annexure P12, shall be looked into and if any threat perception is found, appropriate action will be taken, in accordance with law. 2. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed. 3. Disposed of. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 16.03.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.03.16 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document