IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10331 of 2025 Decided on: 20.05.2026 Yog Raj …….Petitioner Versus State of HP and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rathore, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be served, in case, the representation of the petitioner, which is appended with the petition as Annexure P-3, dated 07.03.2025, is ordered to be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the contents thereof, within some reasonable time. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that let the representation filed by the petitioner, appended with the writ petition as Annexure P-3, dated 07.03.2025, be decided by the competent Authority, in light of the averments made therein within a period of 8 weeks from today, by passing a speaking order, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 20, 2026 (narender) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?