[2025:RJ-JP:2006] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1541/2024 1. Naved Khan S/o Shri Latif Khan, R/o Shami Shehzad, Near The Dhai Din Ka Jhopda Andarcot Dargha Ajmer Shareef Police Station Dargaha Distt. Ajmer 2. Juned Khan S/o Shri Latif Khan, R/o Shami Shehzad, Near The Dhai Din Ka Jhopda Andarcot Dargha Ajmer Shareef Police Station Dargaha Distt. Ajmer 3. Parwej Khan S/o Shri Latif Khan, R/o Shami Shehzad, Near The Dhai Din Ka Jhopda Andarcot Dargha Ajmer Shareef Police Station Dargaha Distt. Ajmer 4. Juber Khan S/o Latif Khan, R/o Shami Shehzad, Near The Dhai Din Ka Jhopda Andarcot Dargha Ajmer Shareef Police Station Dargaha Distt. Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P 2. Haseena W/o Abdul Aziz, R/o Near The Dhai Din Ka Jhopa Andarco Dargha Ajmershareef Police Station Dargaha Distt. Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hanish Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/01/2025 1. Matter comes up on an application(IA No.921/2024) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act by the applicants-petitioners for condonation of delay of two hundred twenty six (226) days' in filing the present revision petition assailing the order of framing charges for offences under Section 342, 342/34, 330,330/34, 302 & 302/34 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:2006] (2 of 2) [CRLR-1541/2024] 2. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the applicants-petitioners and also perused the averments made in the application for condonation delay. 3. Though, in the application for condonation of delay, the only reason which has been given out is that the applicants-petitioners is a poor person and he was not in a position to pay the advocate fees, as such he could not file the present revision petition on time. 4. The reason given out in the memo of application (IA No.921/2024) for condonation of delay is not a convincing ground to condone the delay in filing the present revision petition. 5. Accordingly, application (IA No.921/2024) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is dismissed. 6. As a result, the present revision petition being time barred is also dismissed. 7. Since the main petition has been dismissed, all pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /68