Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29366 (RAJ)

SARJAN SINGH S/O BHARAT SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11301/2025 · 2025-09-16

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37661] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 4th Bail Application No. 11301/2025 Sarjan Singh S/o Bharat Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bishankheda, Police Station Manoharthana, District Jhalawar (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Aklera, District Jhalawar, (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Yadav Mr. Pranav Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Public Prosecutor Mr. Mritunjya Sharma for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/09/2025 1. This fourth bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.315/2024 registered with the Police Station Manohar Thana, District Jhalawar for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 3(5) & 352 of BNS. 2. Heard. Considered. 3. The submissions made by counsel for the accused petitioner is that the accused petitioner is in custody since 01.10.2024 and both, the accused petitioner and the injured persons are members of the same family and with the motivation of the villagers they have entered into compromise. He further submits that the compromise was submitted before the court below. [2025:RJ-JP:37661] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11301/2025] 4. The Court below has attested the compromise to the extent of offences punishable under Sections 123(2), 115(2), 3(5), 118(2), 3(5) & 352 of BNS and acquitted the accused petitioner from the aforesaid offences. The only trial remains for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1) & 3(5) of BNS. 5. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the accused petitioner is in custody since 01.10.2024 and for the offeces other than the offence under Section 109(1)/3(5) of BNS, the compromise submitted by the complainant party has been attested and the accused petitioner has been acquitted for those offences, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this fourth bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before the trial Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/11