Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29366 (AP)

Undi Solmanraju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

WP/11160/2014 · 2025-09-11

Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

I APHC010420342014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 11160 OF 2014 Between: Undi Solmanraju, S/o.Chittaiah, Aged about 43 years, R/o.MIG-D-355, Sagar Nagar, Visakhapatnam, presently residing at G.P.O. Box No.2729, NT Palmetston, Australia. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary, (Home), A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Director General of Police, Hyderabad. The Deputy inspector General of Police, Visakhapatnam Range, Visakhapatnam District. The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram, Vizianagaram District. The Station House Officer Poosapatirega Police Station, Vizianagaram District. Addepalli Venkata Sanyasi Raju, S/o.Butchi Appala Raju, R/o.Flat No.S3, Gayatri Sadan, Srinivasa nagar, Vizianagaram. Chintalapati Satyanarayana Raju, S/o.Appala Subba Rau, R/o.Raja Veedhi, Poosapatirega, Vizianagaram District. Pakki Srinivasa Rao, s/o.late Syam Sundara Rao, R/o.D.No.32-2-63 , Nathayyapalem, BHPV Post, Visakhapatnam. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. I 9. Inja Venkata Ramana, S/o.late Sanyasi Rao, R/o.Rekhana Street Parlakhemudi, Gajapathi District, Odissa State. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order direction declaring the action of the 5^^ Respondent in not registering the F.I.R. against the Respondents 6 to 9 herein and others basing on the report given by the petitioner dated 9.11.2012 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and against the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the Official Respondents herein to register F.I.R. against the Respondents 6 to 9 herein and others, basing on the report dated 09.11.2012 given by the Petitioner. or lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 14060 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 5*^ Respondent herein to register the Report given by the Petitioner on 9.11.2012 as F.I.R., pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NAGENDRA BABU FOR SRI T. NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nps.6 to 8: NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondent No.9 : SRI KESAPURAM SUDHAKAR The Court made the following order: f APHC010420342014 THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 11160/2014 Between: 1.UNDI SOLMANRAJU,, S/O.CHITTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O.MIG-D-355, SAGAR NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT G.P.O. BOX N0.2729, NT PALMETSTON, AUSTRALIA. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (HOME), A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, HYDERABAD. 3.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM RANGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER POOSAPATIREGA POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 6.ADDEPALLI VENKATA SANYASI RAJU, S/O.BUTCHI APPALA RAJU, R/O.FLAT NO.S3, GAYATRI SADAN, SRINIVASA NAGAr! VIZIANAGARAM. 7.CHINTALAPATI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O.APPALA SUBBA RAU, R/O.RAJA VEEDHI, POOSAPATIREGA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 8.PAKKI SRINIVASA RAO, S/0.LATE SYAM SUNDARA RAO, R/O.D.NO.32-2-63, NATHAYYAPALEM BHPV POST, % VISAKHAPATNAM. 9. INJA VENKATA RAMANA, S/0.LATE SANYASI RAO, R/O.REKHANA STREET, PARLAKHEMUDI, GAJAPATHI DISTRICT, ODISSA STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the action of the 5th Respondent in not registering the F.I.R. against the Respondents 6 to 9 herein and others basing on the report given by the petitioner dated 9.11.2012 as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and against the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the Official Respondents herein to register F.I.R. against the Respondents 6 to 9 herein and others, basing on the report dated 09.11.2012 given by the Petitioner lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 14060 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 5th Respondent herein to register the Report given by the Petitioner on 9.11.2012 as F.I.R., pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.T NAGARJUNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2.KESAPURAM SUDHAKAR The Court made the following: ) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.11160 OF 2014 ORDER:- Sri Nagendra Babu, learned counsel representing Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner on record submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Placing the submission of the learned counsel on record, this Writ 2. Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// [ // SECTJON OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri T. Nagarjuna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. One CC to Sri Kesapuram Sudhakar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies Cnr ( HIGH COURT DATED: 12/09/2025 \ ORDER WP NO. 11160 OF 2014 16 SEP 2025 m O . Current isection ^ DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS