1 2025:CGHC:27961-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 343 of 2025 Dilip Deshlehra S/o Late Shri Bhaka Das Aged About 52 Years R/o Lakshmi Para, Nandni Road, Jamul, Police Station- Jamul, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Home Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Superintendent of Police Durg, S.P. Office, Collectorate Campus, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Jamul, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Inspector General of Police Durg Range, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Jibran Ahmed S/o Siddiqui Ahmed Aged About 25 Years R/o Lakshmipara, Nandini Road, Ward No. 4, Tehsil- Jamul, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Avinash Chand Shau, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.06.27 10:52:32 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 26 .06.2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1. That this Honble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.1 to 4 for proper investigation in the matter and to constitute a team for searching of the young missing girl, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case may be given.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that despite complaint made by the petitioner, respondents authorities have not taken any action on the complaint made by the petitioner. 3. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the Court below by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or 200 of the Cr.P.C. He further submits that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also dismissed in terms of the said order. 3 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Gowri/ Amardeep