--1-- C.M.P. No. 220 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.M.P. No. 220 of 2025 ---- 1. Raju Munda, aged about 43 years 2. Prem Chandra Munda, aged about 63 years 3. Sohan Munda, aged about 47 years, All are sons of Rikhilala Munda 4. Ruplal Munda, aged about 32 years, son of Bhola Nath Munda 5. Hulas Munda, aged about 45 years, son of Bigan Munda 6. Urmila Devi, aged about 56 years, widow of Late Lal Mohan Munda 7. Most. Tara Devi, aged about 49 years, widow of Late Haradhan Munda All are residents of village – Takaha, PO and PS – Petarwar, District – Bokaro .... Petitioners -- Versus -- 1. State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building PO & PS – Dhurwa, District – Ranchi 2. Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, PO and PS – B.S. City, District – Bokaro 3. Land Reforms Dy. Collector, Bermo at Tenughat, PO and PS – Tenughat, District – Bokaro 4. District Land Acquisition Officer, Bokaro, PO and PS – B.S. City, District – Bokaro 5. Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, Bokaro, PO and PS – B.S. City, District – Bokaro 6. Rameshwari Devi, wife of Banshidhar Prasad, resident of village – Takaha, PO and PS – Petarwar, District - Bokaro .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Ms. Ishaani Singh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Piyush Anand, Advocate For the NHAI :- Ms. Sweety Topno, Advocate :- Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, Advocate ---- 04/21.03.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned counsel appearing for the respondent State and learned counsel appearing for the NHAI. --2-- C.M.P. No. 220 of 2025 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of W.P.(C) No.4126 of 2023 to its original file which has been dismissed on 14.10.2024 for non- compliance of the pre-emptory order dated 23.09.2024. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the order was not correctly noted in the file and in view of that within time it was not complied, however, now the objections have already been met with. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have got no serious objection if the said W.P.(C) is restored to its original file. 5. In view of the above and looking into the contents of the C.M.P, the Court finds that sufficient ground has been made out for the restoration of W.P.(C) No.4126 of 2023. As such W.P.(C) No.4126 of 2023 is hereby restored to its original file. 6. This petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/