Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29358 (RAJ)

DEEPAK S/O SHRI MANI RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10876/2024 · 2025-01-24

Anil Kumar Upman

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3663] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10876/2024 Deepak S/o Shri Mani Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Majhola, P.s. Kasba Thana Dist. Baran (Raj.). (Presently Confined At Dist. Jail Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Jain & Ms. Sudha Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.56/2024 registered at Police Station Kasba Thana, District Baran (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Section 304B of IPC. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Section 304B & 306 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that deceased was happily living with the petitioner. Inviting attention of this Court towards the statement of brother of the deceased recorded under Section 161 Cr.PC, counsel submits that deceased was in depression as she conceived many times but on every occasion, her pregnancy could not be maintained. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.08.2024 and [2025:RJ-JP:3663] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10876/2024] trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; petitioner is in custody since 12.08.2024 and trial will take considerable time, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Deepak S/o Shri Mani Ram shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /66