Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29354 (CHH)

M/S SWASTIK TRADING COMPANY v. INDUSIND BANK

WPC/2910/2020 · 2025-06-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2910 of 2020 1 - M/s Swastik Trading Company Through Its Proprietor Mr. Ravindra Raikwar At 384, Priyadarshni Nagar, Sector 6, Katora Talab, Raipur Tah. And Dist. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Mr. Ravindra Raikwar S/o Shri Vidhyadhar Raikwar Aged About 30 Years Proprietor M/s. Swastik Trading Company Plot No. 384, P.H. No. 114, Priyadarshni Grih Nirman Samiti, Village Tikrapara, Priyadarshni Nagar, Raipur, Tah. And Dist. Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Indusind Bank Through The Manager Colors Mall, N.H. 43, Pachpedi Naka, Raipur Tah. And Dist. Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Central Office At 1st Floor, Raheja Centre Point, 294 Cst Road, Near Mumbai University, Kalina Mumbai 400098 ---- Respondents For Petitioners : None appears even in two rounds For respondents : Mr. Aditya Chopda, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19.06.2025 1. The petitioners have filed this petition seeking the following relief(s) : “1. That the Hon'ble court may kind enough to call the record of the petitioner. 2. That the Hon'ble Court may be kind enough to pass a appropriate writ/ writs, order/ orders, direction/directions to quash the impugned notice Annexure P-1 in the interest of justice. 3.That the Hon'ble Court may be kind enough to pass any other order or direction as deemed fit in the circumstances of the case.” 2. The petitioners have challenged a notice issued by the REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- respondents under the provisions of Section 13(2) of the Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short ‘the Act of 2002’) by filing this petition. 3. It is pleaded that the Debt Recovery Tribunal is not functioning on account of COVID-Outburst. 4. Now COVID period is over and the Debt Recovery Tribunal is also in functioning, therefore, the petitioners may approach the learned Tribunal, if so advised. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha