[2025:RJ-JP:37827] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13490/2025 Lokesh Rathor S/o Chaturbhuj Rathor, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Opposite Sbbj Bank, Main Road, Ward No. 3, Mangrol, District Baran, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur. 3. The Principal, Govt. Varishtha Upadhyay Sanskrit School, Tel Factory, Baran. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13454/2025 Sunder Singh S/o Satyaveer Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Kirat Singhpura, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Sanskrit Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jaipur. 3. The Principal, Govt. Varishtha Upadhyay Sanskrit School, Neemla, Panchayat Samiti Rajgarh, District Alwar. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13852/2025 Sanjeev Kumar S/o Shri Roop Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Nagla Algarji Ka Nagla, Village Gurdhanadi, Tehsil Bayana, District Bharatpur,(Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Sanskrit Education, Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj.). 2. Commissioner, Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Divisional Sanskrit Education Officer, Bharatpur Division, Bharatpur (Raj) 4. Principal, Government Senior Upadhayay, Sanskrit, School Sewar, (Bharatpur) 5. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Chairman ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:37827] (2 of 2) [CW-13490/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Himanshu Jain Mr. Prem Kumar Sharma with Mr. Manish Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, AG assisted by Ms. Dhriti Laddha Ms. Manju Joshi, AGC with Ms. Deepa Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 17/09/2025 These civil writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- 1. The orders impugned 22.08.2025 & 23.08.2025 respectively are permitted to be withdrawn and are quashed and set aside accordingly. Consequences to follow. 2. The respondents are at liberty to pass the order(s) afresh in accordance with law in respect of the subject-matter of the orders impugned. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/54-56