V.VIJAYAMMA v. THE GOVT.OF A.P., EDUCATION DEPT & 5
WP/17654/2003 · 2025-09-25
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29350 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29350 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010419472003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17654/2003 Between:
1. V.VIJAYAMMA, W/O.V.S.RAMANNA HOUSE WIFE R/O.D.NO.5/188, INDUKURPETA INDUKURPETA MANDAL NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVT OF A P EDUCATION DEPT 5, DEPARTMENT, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF, SCHOOL EDUCATION, SAIFABAD,HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. M K R HIGH SCHOOL INDUKURPETA, INDUKURPETA MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. REP.BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, A.VENKU REDDY
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the orders passed by the 3rd respondent in RC.No.625/A3/2002 dated 27.3.2003 and set aside the orders of
termination issued by the 6th respondent in Rc.No.1/E/93 dated 3-3-1993 and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner forthwith with all consequential and incidental benefits including arrears of salary for the period from 1-10-1991 to 2-3-1993. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 21963 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner forthwith in the 6th respondent school. IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 21964 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the appointments to be made by the 6th respondent school by reserving one post to the petitioner. IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 22669 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to hear my Writ Petition as expeditiously as possible preferably in the fourth week of July'05 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. L V S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V AJAYAKUMAR
2. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
3.
Y S VENKATA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER
Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR