1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO.18414 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: ABDUL AZEEZ S/O LATE BAVAKA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, SAGAR TRANSPORTS, SOUDHA COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR RAILWAY BRIDGE, MRPL ROAD, SURATHKAL-575 104. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . MRS. SESI W/O SANJEEVA MAISTRY, AGED 65 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.19-40/39, VENKATRAMANA COLONY, THADAMBAIL, SURATKAL, MANGALORE TALUK-575 001. 2 . MRS. SHANTHA W/O LATE SADHOO, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.8-142, NEAR GURU SEVA MANDIRA, SURATHKAL, MANGALORE-575 001. 3 . MR.GOPALA S/O LATE KORAGA MUKARI, AGED 61YEARS R/AT D.NO.8-9-10, 2 RAGHAVENDRA SMRUTHI, BALLI COMPOUND, ASHOKNAGARA POST, KODIKAL, MANGALORE-575 006. 4 . MRS.VEDAVATHI W/O LATE SHANKAR, D/O LATE PARAMESHWARA AND PADMAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS 5 . MRS.TULSI W/O KARUNAKARA, D/O LATE PARAMESHWARA AND PADMAVATHI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 6 . MR.DHANRAJ AGED 48 YEARS, S/O LATE PARAMESHWARA AND PADMAVATHI 7 . MR.GANESH AGED 43 YEARS, S/O LATE PARAMESHWARA AND PADMAVATHI RES.NO.4 TO 7 RESIDING AT "KAVYASHREE NILAYA", THADAMBAIL, SURATKAL VILLAGE, MANGALORE-575001. 8 . MR.VENKATESH S/O LATE PARAMESHWARA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT C/O GIRIJA NAGARAJ, SHIVAKRIPA HOUSE, RAMANAGARA ROAD, MANCHURU, SRINIVASNAGARA, SURATHKAL, MANGALORE-575 001. 9 . MRS. NARSI HENGSU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 10 . MR.HARISHA AGED 38 YEARS 11 . MR. KUSHALA AGED 26 YERAS 12 . MS.REKHA AGED 24 YEARS 3 13 . MR.VISHWANATHA AGED 22 YEARS RES. NO.9 IS THE WIDOW AND NOS.9 TO 11 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE SHEENA @ SHENA MAISTRY ALL ARE R/AT ALANGARU DARKAS, MUNDKUR VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK-575 001. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 27.02.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.225 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MANGALORE, D.K. AS PER ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The suit in O.S.No.225/2016 from which the present writ petition arises was disposed off on 08.03.2022. Hence, this writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE PMR