Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29345 (BOM)

GUDIYA BUDHARAM PASWAN AND ORS v. SACHIN SUDHAKAR GAIKWAD AND ANR

CA/11115/2024 · 2025-01-30

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 914ca11115.24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11115 OF 2024 IN FAST/27285/2024 GUDIYA BUDHARAM PASWAN AND ORS VERSUS SACHIN SUDHAKAR GAIKWAD AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Badakh Vishal S. Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Choudhari Abhijit G. ... CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 30.01.2025 PER COURT :- 1. Heard Mr. Badakh, learned Advocate appearing for the applicants. 2. Applicants seek condonation of delay of 150 days caused in filing appeal against award passed by learned Tribunal under provisions of Motor Vehicles Act. 3. Applicants state that applicants were facing financial duress and could manage amount required for 2 914ca11115.24 filing appeal with great difficulty. They are litigating to get just compensation towards accidental death of their bread earner. Reasons as stated in the application are not controverted by filing affidavit-in-reply. Hence case is made out to condone delay. Resultantly, application stands allowed. Delay of 150 days caused in filing appeal stands condoned. Appeal be registered subject to removal of all offence objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE mahajansb/