IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.4 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Ram Murti & Ors. …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Careful perusal of affidavit dated 10.04.2025 filed by the Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, clearly reveals that in compliance to mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, the petitioners have been granted the benefit of counting their contract service by way of detailed order dated 21.05.2025, subject to the outcome of the LPA (Annexure P-1)l. 2. Careful perusal of order, as detailed hereinabove, clearly reveals that petitioners have been regularized and the services rendered by them on contractual basis prior to their regularization have been counted towards pensionary benefits on a notional basis. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 09, 2025 (sunil)