APHC010009702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 1084 OF 2025 Between: 1. T.S Vijaya Kumar, S/o. Rangaiah Setty, Aged about 70 years, R/o. 46/1M, 25 Aditya Nagar, A.Camp, Kurnool District. 2. T.S.Nagabliushanam, S/o. Rangaiah Setty, Aged about 60 years, R/o. Owk Village and Mandal Kurnool District. 3. T.Anand Kumar, S/o. Rangaiah Setty, Aged about 49 years, R/o. Owk Village and Mandal Kurnool District. 4. Smt. N. Bharathi, W/o. N.V.Ranga Rao, Aged about 41 years, R/o. 12/112 Venkateshwara Nagar 0pp. Abbas Nagar Kallur, Kurnool District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department of Minorities Welfare, Secretariat Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, O/o. 4‘^ Floor, Imdadghar, Market Road, Vijayawada. 3. The District Collector, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 4. The Commissioner, Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Kurnool District. 5. The District Revenue Officer/District Welfare Officer, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 6. The District Minorities Welfare Officer/AddI Dist, Welfare Officer, Kurnool District, Kurnool. 7. TheTahsildar, Kurnool Urban (Mandal & District), Kurnool. 8. The Station House Officer, Kurnool Urban Police Station, Kurnool District. 9. The Inspector Auditor, Wakf, Kurnool District, Kurnool. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or orders. Direction or Directions to declare the action of the 2^^ respondent in issuing the nd proceedings of the 2 F.No.M7/247/Prot/KNL/2001 dated 24.05.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the Petitioners possession'and enjoyment of the property in Sy.No.62, Ac.5-32 cents, situated in Kurnool Town. Respondent in lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned nd Respondent in F.No.M7/247/Prot/KNL/2001 dated including any action for removal of alleged unauthorized construction in Sy.No.62 an extent of Ac.5-32cents, attached Hazrath Abdul Wahab Saheb Gumbaz, situated in Kurnool Town, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. proceedings of the 2 24.05.2024, Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SHAIK KARIMULLA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 6 :GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.2 ; SRI SHAIK KHAJA BASRA, SC FOR WAKF BOARD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3, 5 & 7 :GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI POTHAM VENGALA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.8 & 9 : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010009702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 1084/2025 Between: 1.T.S VIJAYA KUMAR S/0. RANGAIAH SETTY TOYEARS, R/0. 46/1M, 25 ADITYA NAGAR DISTRICT. AGED ABOUT A.CAMP, KURNOOL ) j 2.T.S,NAGABLIUSHANAM,. S/0. RANGAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/0. OWK VILLAGE AND MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3.T.ANAND KUMAR.. S/0. RANGAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/0, OWK VILLAGE AND MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.SMT N. BHARATHI,, W/0. N.V.RANGA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/0. 12/112 VENKATESHWARA NAGAR OPP. ABBAS NAGAR KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF MINORITIES WELFARE. SECRETARIATVELAGAPUDI,GUNTURDISTRICT. 2.THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE WAKF BOARD. REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 0/0 4TH FLOOR. IMDADGHAR. MARKET ROAD. VIJAYAWADA. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 4.THE COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5.THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER/DISTRICT WELFARE OFFICER KUNROOL DISTRICT. KURNOOL. 6.THE DISTRICT MINORITIES WELFARE OFFICER/ADDL DIST WELFARE OFFICER,KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 7.THETAHSILDAR. KURNOOL URBAN (MANDAL AND DISTRICT). KURNOOL. 8.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. KURNOOL URBAN POLICE 9.THE INSPECTOR AUDITOR, WAKF KURNOOL. KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed there\A/ith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order orders. Direction or Directions to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the proceedings of the 2nd F.No.M7/247/Prot/KNL/2001 dated 24.05.2024 as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the Petitioners possession and enjoyment of the property in Sy.No.62, Ac.5-32 cents, situated in Kurnool Town and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 or Respondent in and Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned proceedings of the 2nd Respondent in F.No.M7/247/Prot/KNL/2001 dated 24.05.2024 including any action for removal of alleged unauthorized construction in Sy.No.62 an extent of Ac.5-32cents. attached Hazrath Abdul Wahab Saheb Gumbaz, situated in Kurnool Town, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pas Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.SHAIK KARIMULLA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2.GP FOR HOME 3.GP FOR REVENUE 4.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 5.SHAIK KHAJA BASHA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of the letter dated 30.06.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate authority. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT registrar SECrfepOFFlCER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri Shaik Karimulla, 2. One CC to Sri Potham Vengala Reddy 3. Two CCs to GP for Home Advocate [OPUC] . SC for Municipality [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra 5. Two CCs to GP for Social Welfare, 6. One CC to Sri Shaik Khaja Basha, 7. Two CD Copies Pradesh [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] SC for Wakf Board [OPUC] Cnr ■X HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 « 17 M ?W5 1 ^ . Current Section ORDER WP NO. 1084 OF 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS