Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29335 (PAT)

Devid Kumar Sah @ Devid Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./19150/2025 · 2025-04-19

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19150 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2024 Thana- PANJWARA District- Banka ====================================================== 1. Devid Kumar Sah @ Devid Kumar S/O Vinod kr. Sah Resident of Village- Bhanga, P.S- Falka, District- Katihar. 2. Prince Kumar S/O Umesh Das R/O Village- Sahu Parbatta, P.S- Parbatta, Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md.Najmul Hodda, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 19-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, total 50.250 liters illicit liquor was recovered from two seized motorcycles of which these petitioners are registered owner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioners. Petitioner have got no concern with the alleged recovery and they have been made accused in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19150 of 2025(2) dt.19-04-2025 2/2 this case only on suspicion. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the fact that petitioners are owner of the seized motorcycles, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is refused. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T