SMT. MANJU DEVI W/O SHRI ROHITASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10855/2024 · 2025-01-10
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29325 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 29325 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1715] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10855/2024 Smt. Manju Devi W/o Shri Rohitash, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Bhaloth, Police Station Pacheri Kalan, District Jhunjhunu. Applicant-Accused In Confined In District Jail (Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Heramb Saraswat and Mr. Bhanu Pratap For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 10/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.62/2024 registered at Police Station Pacheri Kalan, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section 302 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no evidence available on record that the accused-petitioner hatched conspiracy with the other co-accused Mansingh, who caused murder of the deceased Bhanaram. No incriminating material was recovered at the instance of the present accused- petitioner. As per the prosecution story, it is stated that deceased Bhanaram was murdered in his house by causing fire arm injury, the accused-petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the
[2025:RJ-JP:1715] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10855/2024] basis of doubt. There is no last seen connecting evidence available against the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and contends that the petitioner's motorcycles was recovered from the possession of the main accused Mansingh and he was in relationship with the petitioner, therefore, the bail application of accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Smt. Manju Devi W/o Shri Rohitash in connection with FIR No.62/2024 registered at Police Station Pacheri Kalan, District Jhunjhunu shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/73