[2025:RJ-JP:35713] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11217/2025 1. Ramkhiladi S/o Mangtinath, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Maharajpura, Police Station Khedlimod, Dist. Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). 2. Jawan Singh S/o Ramkhiladi, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Maharajpura, Police Station Khedlimod, Dist. Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). 3. Raju S/o Ramkhiladi, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Maharajpura, Police Station Khedlimod, Dist. Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). 4. Lokesh S/o Ramkhiladi, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Maharajpura, Police Station Khedlimod, Dist. Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Ramkhiladi S/o Mangtinath, Jawan Singh S/o Ramkhiladi, Raju S/o Ramkhiladi and Lokesh S/o Ramkhiladi in FIR No. 95/2025 dated 21.05.2025 registered at P.S. Kherli Mod District -Bharatpur, [2025:RJ-JP:35713] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11217/2025] whereby the applicants-accused were charged under Sections 115(2), 189(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 352 of BNS. 2. The applicants were arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and are no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicants-accused are required the applicants-accused will be available and charge-sheet is filed.. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant- accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that accused has registered a cross-case for incident of 20.05.2025. He further submitted that as a counter blast, present case is registered by complainant party against petitioners. He further submitted that complainant party was aggressor and it is a case of free fight. He further submitted that both the parties belongs to same family and due to matrimonial dispute after marriage of Lokesh (son of Ram Khiladi) the parties have developed animosity. He further submitted that injured Mahendra and Ram Singh have suffered grievous injuries but none of them is on vital parts. He further [2025:RJ-JP:35713] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11217/2025] submitted that no specific attribution is made upon anyone rather an omnibus allegation is made against petitioners, who are in custody since 30.06.2025 and charge-sheet is fixed for committal orders. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicants-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On the basis of complaint lodged by Mahendra son of Ram Singh on 21.05.2025 for incient of 20.05.2025 against Ram Khiladi and Ors. a report is registered and after investigation police has filed charge-sheet against four persons Raju, Jawan, Lokesh and Ramkhiladi, who are in custody. The injury report and X-ray report of Mahendra Singh indicated that except injury no.3, all are simple in nature and injury No.3 is upon right shoulder. Injuries upon Raman, Akshay and Lokesh were found as simple in nature. Total 9 injuries were sustained by Ram Singh and out of which injury No.2, 3 and 6 were grievous in nature but remaining are simple in nature. Injury No.2 is upon left upper limb (mid arm to hand), Injury No.3 is complaint of pain and there is fracture of ribs, Injury No.6 is complaint of pain and tenderness over right shoulder and there is fracture of clavicle. There is no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and all injuries were caused by a blunt object. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required [2025:RJ-JP:35713] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11217/2025] in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Ramkhiladi S/o Mangtinath, Jawan Singh S/o Ramkhiladi, Raju S/o Ramkhiladi and Lokesh S/o Ramkhiladi, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the petitioners would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /187