IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 8003-2000(O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2025 Agya Ram ….Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. R.K.Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner Ms.Palika Monga, D.A.G., Haryana Ms. Baani Chhibber Mahajan, Advocate for Mr. Daanish Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No. 4-Municipal Committee *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to regularise him as per prevailing Policy as he is working with respondents since October’1993. 2. Counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that petitioner was regularised vide order dated 27.06.2006 in terms of Instructions dated 17.10.2002. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.05.20 05:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No. 8003-2000(O&M) -2- 3. Counsel for respondents submits that Municipal Committee, Nilokheri was re-constituted and at present, petitioner is employee of Municipal Committee, Taraori. 4. As the petitioner stands regularized as per Policy of 2002, this Court does not find it appropriate to direct respondents to consider petitioner’s claim as per Policy prevailing prior to 2002 because in view judgment of Supreme Court in Secretary, State of Karnataka & Others. vs. Umadevi & Others, (2006) 4 SCC 1, the State had withdrawn all the Policies which were prevailing prior to 2006 and thereafter in 2014, Policies of 2002 and 2006 were rekindled, however, Policy of 1996 was not restored. 5. In view of the above, petition stands disposed of. 6. Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 20.05.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.05.20 05:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document