MOHD SADIQ AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH INCHARGE S.H.O. POLICE STATION RAJOURI AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/304/2025 · 2025-08-13
Rajesh Sekhri
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2932 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2932 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: CRM(M) No. 304/2025 CrlM No. 1310/2025 CrlM No. 589/2025
Mohd. Sadiq & Ors. ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Siddhant Gupta, Advocate V/s
UT of J&K & Anr. ….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Arshad Majid Malik, Advocate for No. 2.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 13.08.2025
Pursuant to order dated 06.08.2025, statements of petitioner No. 1-Mohd. Sadiq, petitioner No. 2- Mohd. Azam and private respondent No. 2-Shabina Chowdhary, the complainant, at whose instance, impugned FIR came to be registered against the petitioners, have been reduced into writing by Registrar Judicial of this Court. Respondent No. 2/complainant has stated that she had a matrimonial dispute with her husband petitioner No. 1-Mohd. Sadiq and others, which has been amicably resolved and she is happily living with her husband, petitioner No. 1. A compromise deed dated 22.07.2025 has been executed and duly notarized. The respondent No. 2/complainant has no objection, if the impugned FIR No. 0163/2025 is quashed. In view of the above, since the private respondent has amicably resolved the dispute with her husband and in-laws and they have entered into a Sr.No. 40
2 CRM(M) No. 304/2025
compromise, the continuation of the present petition shall not serve any purpose. Hence, the present petition is allowed and impugned FIR No. 0163/2025 is quashed. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of along with connected CrlM(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE Jammu: 13.08.2025 Meenakshi