' APHC010418892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) J “O no V WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21812 OF 2025 Between: Surya Venkata Satyavathi, W/o. Yarla Srinivas, Female, Aged about 48 D.No. 10-8-5, Ram Nagar, Near GVMC Godown, 1. years, R/o. Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. V//0. Challarao, Female, Age 67 years R/o. D.No.2-13, Vedullapalem Village, Chittibatia Agraharam, Nakkapalle, 2. Vedula Varahalamma Vishakapatnam. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, Department, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Gollapudi, Vijayawada. 4. The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Andhra TTD Administrative Building K.T. Road Tirupati-517 501 Pradesh 5. The Mandal Tahsildar, Nakkapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6. The Sub Registrar, Nakkapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 7. The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. Department ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in th'e nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos. 2 to 7 incorrectly placing my landed property in an extent of Ac. 2.50 cents in R-S.No. 81/2, Nakkapalli Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, which IS in my name and another extent of Ac. 0.48 cents in the name of my mother in the R.S. No. 81/2, Nakkapalli Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, in the disputed properly list under Section 22-A(1) C of the Registration Act, 1908 under the guise of that the property belongs to Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam inspite of letter of Executive Officer in proceedings ROC as illegal, irregular, of Natural Justice and also No. Prop. 5/713/AEO(Prop/TTD) arbitrary, violation of the Provisions of Principles dated 01.08.2020 contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act, Charitable Hindu Religious Instrumentations and its Rules and A.P and endowments Act and also of India and consequently subject land property to an extent of offends Articles 14, 21 and 300 A of Constitution direct the respondents to delete the Ac.2.98 cents in R.S.No. 81/2, Nakkapalli Village and Mandal, registrar being maintained under Visakhapatnam District, from disputed Section 22-A(1) C of the Registration Act. lA NO: 1 OF 909^ Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 7 to praying that in the circumstances stated take steps to delete the subject land property to an extent of Ac.2.98 cents in R.S.No. 81/2, Nakkapalli Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District from disputed registrar being maintained under Section 22-A(1)C of the Registration Act pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MANGENA SREE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. RAMA RAO 1,2 and 5: GP FOR REVENUE 3 and 7 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No. 4; SRI N V S PRASAD VARMA SC FOR TTD Counsel for the Respondent No. 6; GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following order: APHC010418892025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21812/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) Surya Venkata Satyavathi, and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petltioner(S): 1.MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 4.Sri N.V.S. PRASAD VARMA, learned Standing Counsel for Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) The Court made the following: W.P. No.21812 OF 2025 Date of order:20.08.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.21812 OF 7r\9R ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the aggrieved by the inaction of Respondents No. 2 to 7 in not deleting their property to an extent of land Ac.2.50 cents, in the name of the 1®‘ petitioners are petitioner and an extent of land Ac.0.48 cents, in the name of the 2'’'' petitioner in R.S.No.81/2, Visakhapatnam District, from the list Nakkapalli Village and Mandal, maintained under Section 22- A(1)(c) of the Registration Act, 1908. 2. It is submitted that the subject property of the as the property belonging to Tirumala petitioners has been considered Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD). It is further submitted that the Executive Officer of TTD. the 4*' respondent herein, had addressed a letter dated 01.08.2020 duly informing the petitioners that the land admeasuring Ac.2.50 cents in Sy.No.81/2 in Nakkapalli Village does not belong to the 4**" respondent as the same does not figure in the list of the TTD lands pertaining to Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Upamaka It was also informed that the 3'"^ respondent is the competent authority to decide the issue and the Village, Nakkalapalli Mandal. requirement for continuing the disputed land maintained under Section 22-A(1)(c) of the Registration Act. in the prohibited list 3 L W.P. No.21812 OF 2025 Date of order:20.08.2025 3. The learned Standing Counsel for the 4''’ respondent also submits that the communication from the 4*^ unambiguous. It is for the petitioners to respondent has been clear and approach the 3^"* respondent and seek tor the relief. It is submitted that as on date, the petitioners have not made any representation to the competent authority to enable the competent authority to consider the same and pass necessary orders. 4. Heard the submissions of the learned the learned standing counsel 5. Considering the submissions of both counsel for the petitioners and appearing for the TTD. the learned counsel, it is left open for the petitioners to submit a fresh representation to the 3"“ respondent received from the 4'*’ respondent and enclosing the correspondence seek for deletion of the subject disputed land in the prohibited list maintained under Section Of the Registration Act. The 3 property of the petitioners from the 22-A(1)(c) respondent shall pass necessary orders in accordance with law within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioners, petition is disposed of. No costs, any, pending in this writ petition shall stand 6. With these observations, the writ Miscellaneous petitions, if closed. 7. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The District Collector, Visakhapatnam District, Visakhapatna m. 3. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Gollapudi, Vijayawada. 4. The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, TTD Administrative Building K.T. Road Tirupati-517 501 Andhra Pradesh 5. The Mandal Tahsildar, Nakkapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 6. The Sub Registrar, Nakkapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. 7. The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 8. OneCCto Sri. Mangena Sree Rama Rao Advocate [OPUC] 9. One CC to Sri. N V S Prasad Varma SC for TTD [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 10. [OUT] 11. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 12. Two CCs to GP for Registration and Stamps, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 13. gsc HIGH COURT DATED:20/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 21812 OF 2025 ANO^ S 0 6 SEP 2025 ^ ^^s£?SPATCW*2j^ ■S DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS