Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5894 CRL.A No. 1059 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1059 OF 2015 BETWEEN:
R. SATHYANARAYANA REDDY S/O LATE RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO. 59, VIGNESH 15TH CROSS, DOLLARS LAYOUT J.P. NAGAR, 4TH PHASE BANGALORE-78 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. S.M. ANEES AHAMED, ADVOCATE – [ABSENT]) AND:
SMT. GAYATHRI NAGARAJ W/O S. NAGARAJ R/AT NO. 675, 2ND FLOOR ABOVE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL KONANAKUNTE CROSS KANAKAPURA ROAD BANGALORE-62 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHANDRAHASA RAI B, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.06.2015 PASSED BY THE XXII A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.18495/2012 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5894 CRL.A No. 1059 of 2015
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation on the appellant side.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant was also absent on 21.12.2023, 06.02.2024 and 07.03.2024.
3. The appeal is of the year 2015. Inspite of granting sufficient opportunity, learned counsel for the appellant is not present to argue this matter. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this matter.
4. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE DSP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60