Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 29309 (BOM)

PRASHANT GOVINDRAO PATIL v. SANJIVANI PRASHANT PATIL

CA/10549/2025 · 2025-09-26

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Vaishali Patil Jadhav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 910-CA-10549-25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10549 OF 2025 IN FCA/71/2018 PRASHANT GOVINDRAO PATIL VERSUS SANJEEVANI PRASHANT PATIL ... Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Applicant Mr. Mahesh V. Ghatge, Advocate for Respondent CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SMT. VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 26th SEPTEMBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. The present civil application is filed for extension of six weeks time to deposit the arrears of maintenance. Learned advocate for applicant submits that the arrears of maintenance amount are to the tune of Rs.16,80,000/-. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH 2025:BHC-AUG:26772-DB