Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.233 of 2025 Sankarsan Panigrahi ..... Appellant Represented by Adv. - Saibrata Rath -versus- State Of Odisha and others ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Parhi, ASC CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 31.03.2026 Order No. 02. I.A. No.431 of 2025 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 3. Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for condonation of delay. 4. This is an application for condonation of delay of 1932 days. 5. Taking into consideration the grounds taken in the petition for condonation of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay of 1932 days subject to payment of cost of Rs.2000/- to be paid before the Juvenile Justice Fund managed by Member Secretary, OSLSA. 6. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. Page 2 of 2. FAO No.233 of 2025 7. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 8. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the Parties that the issue involved in the present appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court so passed on 19.03.2025 in FAO No.509 of 2014 and batch. 9. In view of such submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the present FAO is disposed of in the light of judgment so passed in FAO No.509 of 2014 and batch. ( Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge S.K. Rout